This Brzezinski’s
statement would finish off the Obama administration. I wrote in my diary of June 30: “At 19:51, Zbigniew
Brzezinski has made a decision to completely surrender.” I was surprised to learn that an article
about such statement had already been released.
I’d like to give
some explanation about it. Zbigniew
Brzezinski is Obama’s mentor and they belong to the Rockefeller/Obama
camp. It is Hilary Clinton that
intervened Syria, which is apparently the intention of the Bush/Nazi camp. They have tried to initiate a World War III
by all means based on their thought and creed.
This article has made it clear that Brzezinski has felt bitter about
Obama who is dragged into the Bush/Nazi camp which has apparently different
ideas. John Kerry replaced Hillary
Clinton as Secretary State. He was Skull
and Bones member and actually a leading figure of MJ12 (Majestic 12). In the previous day, Mr. Benjamin Fulford
mentioned five forces. John Kerry does
not belong to these five forces but belong to a group I call the old Hermes
remnants. It is John Kerry that has
continued supplying weapons to Syrian rebels.
According to Mr. Fulford, MJ12 is an official Illuminati. As a matter of fact, however, it is a
behind-the-scene Illuminati which is a group conflicting with the traditional
group.
Previously, I
wrote a comment: “Brzezinski has already gone.”
At present, he is completely controlled by A Hotsuma deity, who has
gained entrance to his physical body. I
have expected him to be surrendered some day in the future, out of mounting
fear when seeing the company around him killed one after another. However, I have never dreamed at all that he
gave the final word to Obama in this manner.
I suppose that
Brzezinski’s physical body will not be executed due to this confession.
Masatoshi Takeshita
July 2, 2013
English
translation of an excerpt from a Japanese article: ROCKWAY EXPRESS –
July 2, 2013 –
Brzezinski: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and their western allies orchestrated
Syria crisis
Brzezinski has disclosed
the fact that the Syria crisis was orchestrated
by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and
their western allies.
I hear that Brzezinski, a famous diplomatic expert and master of
strategy, have made statement that the crisis in Syria
has been orchestrated by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and their western allied. We have obtained from him “a favorable
endorsement” to our claim which has been posted on our blog ROCKWAY EXOPRESS
for more than two years.
——————–
Brzezinski: Saudi
Arabia, Qatar, and their western allies orchestrated Syria crisis
[June 29 Press TV]
The former US national security adviser says the ongoing crisis in Syria has
been orchestrated by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and their western allies.
“In late 2011 there are outbreaks in
Syria produced by a drought and abetted by two well-known autocracies in the
Middle East: Qatar and Saudi Arabia,” Zbigniew Brzezinski said in an interview
with The National Interest on June 24.
He added that US President Barack Obama also supported the unrest in Syria and suddenly announced that President Bashar al-Assad “has to go — without, apparently, any real preparation for making that happen.”
“Then in the spring of 2012, the election year here, the CIA under General Petraeus, according to The New York Times of March 24th of this year, a very revealing article, mounts a large-scale effort to assist the Qataris and the Saudis and link them somehow with the Turks in that effort,” said Brzezinski, who was former White House national security adviser under Jimmy Carter and now a counselor and trustee at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a senior research professor at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University.
Criticizing the Obama administration’s
policies regarding Syria, he questioned, “Was this a strategic position? Why did we all of a sudden decide
that Syria had to be destabilized and its government overthrown? Had it ever been explained to the
American people? Then in the latter part of 2012, especially after the elections, the
tide of conflict turns somewhat against the rebels. And it becomes clear that not all of those
rebels are all that ‘democratic.’ And so the whole policy begins to be
reconsidered.”
“I think these things need to be clarified so that one can have a more insightful understanding of what exactly US policy was aiming at,” Brzezinski added.
He also called on US officials to push much more urgently to draw in China, Russia and other regional powers to reach some kind of peaceful end to the Syrian crisis.
“I think if we tackle the issue alone with the Russians, which I think has to be done because they’re involved partially, and if we do it relying primarily on the former colonial powers in the region-France and Great Britain, who are really hated in the region-the chances of success are not as high as if we do engage in it, somehow, with China, India and Japan, which have a stake in a more stable Middle East,” Brzezinski said.
Brzezinski also warned again any US-led military intervention in Syria or arming the militants fighting government forces there.
“I’m afraid that we’re headed toward an ineffective American intervention, which is even worse. There are circumstances in which intervention is not the best but also not the worst of all outcomes. But what you are talking about means increasing our aid to the least effective of the forces opposing Assad. So at best, it’s simply damaging to our credibility. At worst, it hastens the victory of groups that are much more hostile to us than Assad ever was. I still do not understand why — and that refers to my first answer — why we concluded somewhere back in 2011 or 2012 — an election year, incidentally that Assad should go.”
Foreign-sponsored militancy in Syria, which erupted in March 2011, has claimed the lives of many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel.
The New York Times said in a recent report the CIA was cooperating with Turkey and a number of other regional governments to supply arms to militants fighting the government in Syria.
The report comes as the US has repeatedly voiced concern over weapons falling into the hands of al-Qaeda-linked terrorist groups.
Al-Nusra Front was named a terrorist organization by Washington last December, even though it has been fighting with the US-backed so-called Free Syrian Army in its battle against Damascus.
(Note)
Font change into red
letters made by Mr. Takeshita
Leave a Reply