image: &
Obama’s Absurd Speech at UN – US Advances Agenda of Global Control
Obama’s Absurd Speech at UN – US Advances Agenda of Global Control
The first half of the article is about explanation of Obama’s absurd speech. Reading the article, we will see that his speech was far more boldfaced lie than Abe’s lie that the crisis at the Fukushima nuclear power plant is under control. I wonder if what makes people still continue to support the figure who can tell such a malicious lie. From my viewpoint, they are nothing but accomplices of evil.
As for the latter half (Read More), it
seems to me that the content of this article is overlapped with the content of
yesterday’s article “Near future of US disclosed by former U.S. air forcegeneral.” In other words, it is the
Obama administration that advances the agenda of the global control by the
elite. Obama’s speech clearly suggests
it.
Masatoshi
Takeshita
September
28, 2014
Excerpt from a Japanese article: Overseas ArticlesNever Reported by Mass Media – September 28, 2014 –
Will
Russia and China Hold Their Fire Until War Is the Only Alternative?
Paul Craig Roberts
Obama’s September 24 speech at the UN is the most absurd thing I
have heard in my entire life. It is absolutely amazing that
the president of the United States would stand before the entire world and tell what everyone knows are blatant lies
while simultaneously demonstrating Washington’s double standards and belief
that Washington alone, because the US is
exceptional and indispensable, has the right to violate all law.
It is even more amazing that every person present did not get up
and walk out of the assembly.
The diplomats of the world actually sat there and listened to blatant lies from the world’s worst terrorist. They even clapped their approval.
The rest of the speech was just utter bullshit: ・・・・・・・・・
・・・・・ “Russian aggression in Europe
recalls the days when large nations trampled small ones in pursuit of
territorial ambition.”
“After the people of Ukraine mobilized popular protests and calls for reform, their corrupt president fled. Against the will of the government in Kiev, Crimea was annexed. Russia poured arms into eastern Ukraine, fueling violent separatists and a conflict that has killed thousands. When a civilian airliner was shot down from areas that these proxies controlled, they refused to allow access to the crash for days. When Ukraine started to reassert control over its territory, Russia gave up the pretense of merely supporting the separatists, and moved troops across the border.”
The entire world knows that Washington overthrew the elected Ukrainian government, that Washington refuses to release its satellite photos of the destruction of the Malaysian airliner, that Ukraine refuses to release its air traffic control instructions to the airliner, that Washington has prevented a real investigation of the airliner’s destruction, that European experts on the scene have testified that both sides of the airliner’s cockpit demonstrate machine gun fire, an indication that the airliner was shot down by the Ukrainian jets that were following it. ・・・….
Notice that it is not aggression when Washington
bombs and invades seven countries in 13 years without a declaration of war. Aggression occurs when Russia accepts
the petition of Crimeans who voted 97 percent in favor of reuniting with Russia
where Crimea resided for centuries・・・・・・・.
And the entire world knows that, as the separatist leader of the
Donetsk Republic said, “If Russian military units were fighting with us, the
news would not be the fall of Mariupol but the fall of Kiev and Lviv.”
Which is “the cancer of violent extremism”–ISIS which cut off
the heads of four journalists, or Washington which has bombed
seven countries in the 21st century murdering hundreds of thousands of
civilians and displacing millions?
Who is the worst terrorist–ISIS, a group that is redrawing the artificial boundaries created by
British and French colonialists, or Washington with its
Wolfowitz Doctrine, the basis of US foreign policy, which declares Washington’s
dominant objective to be US hegemony over the world?
ISIS is the creation of Washington.
ISIS consists of the jihadists Washington used to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya
and then sent to Syria to overthrow Assad. ・・・・・・・・・…
Obama never mentioned in his speech the central problem that the world faces. That problem is Washington’s inability to accept the existence of strong independent countries such as Russia and China. The neoconservative Wolfowitz Doctrine commits the United States to maintaining its status as the sole Unipower.・・・・・・・・.
A “rival” is defined as any country capable of defending its interests
or those of allies against Washington’s hegemony.
In his speech, Obama told Russia and China that they can be part of
Washington’s world order on the condition that they accept Washington’s
hegemony and do not interfere in any way with Washington’s control. When Obama tells Russia that the US will cooperate with Russia
“if Russia changes course,” Obama means that
Moscow must accept the primacy of Washington’s interest over Russia’s own interest.
Clearly, this is an inflexible and unrealistic position. If
Washington keeps to it, war with Russia and China will ensue.
Obama told China that Washington intended to
continue to be a Pacific power in China’s sphere of influence, “promoting
peace, stability, and the free flow of commerce among nations” by building new US air and naval bases from the Philippines to
Vietnam so that Washington can control the
flow of resources in the South China Sea and cut off China at will.
As far as I can tell, neither the Russian nor Chinese
governments understand the seriousness of the threat that Washington
represents. Washington’s claim to world hegemony seems too farfetched to Russia and China to be real. But it is very real.
Leave a Reply