Ukraine’s President Poroschenko Says Overthrow of Yanukovych Was a Coup – Ukraine Is In Utter Chaos
As mentioned in the Fulford Report, President Poroshenko reportedly has asked the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to acknowledge that former President Yanukovych was overthrown by a coup. He knows about the possibility that his position as president might become illegal. What is the background of his petition despite this?
According to the article, the same group
that lauched the coup has announced that “they will overthrow Poroshenko unless
he restarts right now the war against Donbass.” In other words, Washington that
uses the group has forced Poroshenko to restart the war. Considering the situation,
the Ukrainian army cannot win the war against Donbass. If restarting the war,
the country will be destroyed or unless restarting the war, he will be removed.
It can be said that he has been driven into the wall.
However, as if waiting for the right moment,
former aide to the Ukrainian defense minister deserted to Donbass withenormous amounts of information. It should appall Neoconservatives in
Washington.
Poroshenko might intend to remove the group
that launched the coup by having the court acknowledge them as illegal. If
things don’t go well, however, bloody conflict will occur inside the Kiev
administration and the government will be revealed to be a Nazi group.
It can be said that Ukraine is in utter
chaos.
Masatoshi
Takeshita
June
25, 2015
Excerpt from a Japanese article: Overseas Articles Never Reported by Mass Media – June 25, 2015 –
Ukraine’s
President Poroschenko Says Overthrow of Yanukovych Was a Coup
Source:
By Eric Zuesse
Global Research, June 23, 2015
Ukraine’s
President Petro Poroshenko requests the supreme court of
Ukraine to declare that his predecessor, Viktor Yanukovych, was overthrown by
an illegal operation; in other words,
that the post-Yanukovych government,
including Poroshenko’s own Presidency, came into power
from a coup, not from something democratic, not
from any authentic constitutional process at all.
In
a remarkable document,
which is not posted at the English version of the website ofthe Constitutional Court of Ukraine, but
which is widely reported outside
the United States, includingRussia, Poroshenko,
in Ukrainian (not in English), has petitioned the Constitutional
Court of Ukraine (as it is being widely quoted in English):
“I ask
the court to acknowledge that the law ‘on the removal of the
presidential title from Viktor Yanukovych’ as unconstitutional.”
I
had previously reported, and here will excerpt, Poroshenko’s
having himself admitted prior to 26 February 2014, to
the EU’s investigator, and right after
the February 22nd overthrow of Yanukovych, that the
overthrow was a coup, and that it was even a false-flag
operation, in which the snipers, who were dressed as if they were Ukrainian
Security Bureau troops, were actually not, and that, as the EU’s investigator
put his finding to the EU’s chief of foreign affairs Catherine Ashton [and with
my explanatory annotations here]:
“the
same oligarch [Poroshenko — and so when he became President he already
knew this] told that well, all the evidence shows that the people who
were killed by snipers, from both sides, among policemen and people from
the streets, [this will shock Ashton, who had just said that Yanukovych
had masterminded the killings] that they were the same snipers,
killing people from both sides [so, Poroshenko himself knows
that his regime is based on a false-flag U.S.-controlled coup d’etat against
his predecessor]. … Behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovych, but it was
somebody from the new coalition.”
This
was when Ashton first learned that the myth that Yanukovych had been overthrown
as a result of public outrage at his having rejected the EU’s offer of
membership to Ukraine was just a hoax.
(Actually, the planning for this coup was already under way in the U.S. Embassy by at leastearly 2013, well prior to Yanukovych’s EU decision.
Furthermore, theUkrainian public’s approval of the government peaked right after Yanukovychannounced his rejection of the EU’s offer,
but then the U.S.-engineered“Maidan”riots caused that approval to plunge.)
If
the Court grants Poroshenko’s petition, then the
appointment of Arseniy Yatsenyuk by the U.S. State Department’s Victoria Nuland
on 4 February 2014, which was confirmed by the
Ukrainian parliament (or Rada) at the end of the coup on February 26th,
and the other appointments which were made,
including that of Oleksandr Turchynov to fill in for Yanukovych as caretaker
President until one of the junta’s chosen candidates would be ‘elected’ on May
25th of 2014, which ‘election’ Poroshenko won — all of this was illegal.
However,
this illegality had already been known. It was already explained in detail on
28 February 2014, that, “Yanukovych’sremoval was unconstitutional.” That’s
for lawyers; but, now, finally, Ukraine’s Constitutional Court is
faced with the shocking predicament of Ukraine’s own President, who won his
post as a result of this coup, requesting them to “acknowledge” that it was a
coup, much as the founder of the “private CIA” firm Stratfor
had even called it, “the mostblatant coup in history.” (It
was that because theauthentic video and other evidence of its
having been a Washington job was so massive.)
Also in the news now is
that Dmitriy Yarosh‘s Right Sector — the same groupthat Washington had hired for the coup and for the ethnic cleansing campaign inUkraine’s former Donbass region —
have announced that
they will assemble in Kiev on July 3rd to overthrow Poroshenko unless
he restarts right now the war against Donbass. The people
whom Washington paid to oust Yanukovych are planning to do the same to
Poroshenko. There is a struggleinside the Obama Administration about
how far they can successfully go with their Ukrainian nazis not formally
leading the country.
Washington
is having a hard time keeping in line the Ukrainian
nazis upon whom Washington’s plan for
Ukraine has been based. Ukraine’s
nazis are thirsting for Russian blood, and want to slake their thirst faster
than the Obama Administration is willing to go along with. Washington’s
previous “F—k theEU!” hasn’t worked as well as
they had hoped. There is thus increasingly bad blood between the Obama
Administration and the Ukrainian enforcers upon whom Obama has been
relying.
Basically,
Poroshenko now is torn between the EU, on one side, and
Ukraine’s well-armed nazis, on the other; and, thus
far, the ultimate decider, U.S. President Obama, who has needed cooperation
both from Ukraine’s nazis and from the EU, in order for his Ukrainian gambit
against Russia to work, is on the fence between those two sides. John
Kerry sides with the EU; Victoria Nuland sides with the nazis. But Obama
himself hasn’t yet played his hand.
Investigative
historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not
Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and
of CHRIST’S
VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity,
and of Feudalism,
Fascism, Libertarianism and Economics.
