Mr. Ashton Carter Nominated as Next U.S. Secretary of Defense – Collaborator of True Galactic Federation Elected to Destroy Greenhorns of Bush/Nazi Camp
In an article dated November 25, I
commented that if Ms. Michelle Froino is appointed as successor to Secretary of
Defense Hagel, it would be perfect. However, she was not. It appears that Mr.
Ashton Carter will be approved as incoming Secretary of Defense.
The second article reads that he is
pro-Israel and belligerent person, while the third article reads that “Chuck
Hagel who is critical of Neo-cons and maintains a passive stance to war is
replaced with Ashton Carter who has claimed attack on North Korea.” If this is
true, a superficial trend will be the outbreak of war against Russia.
Seeing this superficial trend, Mr. Paul
Craig Roberts has mentions many times that a world war three will be
inevitable. In view of a deeper viewpoint, however, Mr. Benjamin Fulford’s remark
is right. The Pentagon has no intention to wage a war against Russia. So does
the NATO. I think that this personnel change was a good choice.
As Ashton Carter seems to be very smart, he
won’t be provoked to destroy the world by the Neo-cons. He is not a person
spiritually guided by the (true) “Galactic Federation” but a collaborator of
it. In other words, he is the same type of person as Mr. Fulford. He supports theRepublic America proposed by General Ham. We can say that he has been
chosen to destroy the young of belligerent Bush/Nazi camp.
Masatoshi
Takeshita
December
7, 2014
----------
Mr. Carter
Nominated as Next U.S. Secretary of Defense
Mr. Hagel Stays
Away from Formal Ceremony
Obama
praised the 60-year-old Carter,
saying that as US defense secretary he would bring to the job "a unique
blend of strategic perspective and technical know-how."
Carter, who is expected to be confirmed by the
Senate, was named to replace
Chuck Hagel, who resigned under pressure last week, criticized by some as too
passive in the face of a rapidly changing security situation.
The US military that Carter is expected to inherit finds
itself in an air war against Islamic extremists in Iraq and Syria, a sharp
reversal of course for an administration that had sought to bring home troops
after 13 years of fighting.
Carter said he had accepted Obama's offer "because
of the seriousness of the strategic challenges we face -- but also the bright
opportunities that exist for America if we can come together to grab hold of
them."
Hagel called Carter after the announcement and promised a
smooth transition. In a statement issued as he embarked on his last foreign
trip as secretary, he said he strongly supported Carter's nomination.
----------
English translation of the excerpt from Iran Radio – December 6, 2014 –
US political analyst says
“Nomination of Mr. Carter is a blow to foreign policy”
Mr. Scot Richard, a U.S.
political analyst, says: “Nomination of former Deputy
Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter would give a terrible blow to U.S. foreign
policy.”
Mr. Ricardo on 5 Friday in an interview
with Press TV pointed out that Mr. Carter is a
belligerent person and said: “Assumption of Mr. Carter as Defense
Secretary would give a terrible blow to U.S. foreign policy.”
Furthermore, he says: “Mr. Carter is pro-Israel and supports belligerent policy.”
He also says: “As a result of successive
replacements as this post, President Obama had no other choice. Such being the
case, Mr. Carter has been nominated as successor to Secretary of Defense
Hagel.”
Many people have been nominated as
Secretary Defense but refused to assume the post because of a lot of problems
such as the Syria crisis, intensified activities of terrorist group ISIS in
Iraq, creation of anti-ISIS coalition of the willing led by the U.S., budget
reduction in the U.S. Department of Defense and the withdrawal from the U.S.
military from Afghanistan during the waning reminder of tenure of Obama administration.
President Obama nominated on 5 Friday Mr.
Carter as next Secretary Defense.
Mr. Carter served as Deputy Secretary of
Defense from October 2011 to December 2013 and he also had been in charge of
purchasing weapons in the Pentagon.
Mr. Hagel expressed resignation in less
than two years after assumption for the reason of conflict with President
Obama’s opinion over U.S. strategy in Iraq.
----------
English translation of the except from a
Japanese article: Sakurai Journal – December 6, 2014 -
In
the belligerent atmosphere of U.S. Congress, a resolution interpreted as
“declaration of war against Russia”
The Senate is as belligerent as the House. The Senate resolution submitted in May this year is
said to aim to support military troops in Poland,
Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia and build permanent military bases for NATO
in such countries.
Meanwhile, the secretary
of defense under the Barak Obama administration will be replaced. Chuck Hagel,
who is critical of Neo-cons and maintains a passive stance to war, is replaced
with Ashton Carter who has claimed attack on North Korea. This will be approved by the current Congress.
Independence of Russia and rise of China
are not acceptable to the Neo-cons/Zionists. The
Neo-cons/Zionists have a belligerent vision, which is the strategy leading to
self-destruction for the EU.
However, the lite cannot go against it because they have gained money
and power by following the U.S. They would be severely attacked personally if
they do against the U.S. intention.
This resolution will lead
to paving the way for war. However, the resolution
criticized Russia without any evidence of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and
there is no fact showing the Russia has invaded Ukraine. The Western media have
kept on covering false information.
The House has adopted the resolution
writing a long list of nonsense and tried to threaten
Russia with a war. However, Russia would never yield to such threat.
The U.S. is accelerating the trend towards
war contrary to the will of the people.
It appears that due
to the right of collective self-defense, the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty will
force Japan to work together with NATO. Since the NATO considers an
attack against one nation as the attack against the entire organization, it is possible that the Japanese will be destroyed, considering the location of Japan.
.
