Truth is Washington’s Enemy – The People Express Dissent to Government Considered as Terrorist –
In yesterday’s article, I introduced that there is dubious move in the U.S. According to the article written by Mr. Paul Craig Roberts, it appears that the people who express dissent to the government are considered as terrorist (domestic extremists).
The article mentions detention camps, which
probably means FEMA. The article reads that “very strange military exercises”
are being carried out to round up ordinary people and the state and local
militarized police are trained to view US citizens as threats.
In Ukraine, those who oppose the Kiev
administration are treated as terrorists. This article shows that it is the
same as in the U.S. Do you understand how much courage Mr. Paul Craig Roberts needs
to give such comment in this situation?
In Japan, when Mr. Shigeaki Koga gave
critical remarks on the Abe administration in a TV program Hodo Station, it
created a sensation. Unless we clearly indicate our intention never to approve
the Abe administration which follows the instructions of the U.S. before it is
too late, Japan will be driven into the same situation as the U.S.
As Mr. Fulford has already mentioned, I am
afraid that maybe a civil war has already broken out behind the scenes in the
U.S.
Masatoshi
Takeshita
Aril
23, 2015
Excerpt from a Japanese article: Overseas Articles Not Reported by Mass Media – April 23, 2015 –
Truth is Washington’s Enemy
Source:
Truth Is Washington’s Enemy
Paul Craig Roberts
US Representative Ed Royce (R, CA) is
busy at work destroying the possibility of truth being spoken in the US.
On April 15 at a hearing before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs of which
Royce is chairman, Royce made use of two minor presstitutes to help him
redefine all who take exception to Washington’s lies as “threats” who belong to
a deranged pro-Russian propaganda cult.
www.prisonplanet.com/bloggers-compared-to-isis-during-congressional-hearing.html
www.prisonplanet.com/bloggers-compared-to-isis-during-congressional-hearing.html
Washington’s problem is that whereas Washington controls
the print and TV media in the US and its vassal states in Europe, Canada,
Australia, Ukraine, and Japan, Washington does not control Internet sites, such
as this one, or media, such as RT, of non-vassal states. Consequently, Washington’s
lies are subject to challenge, and as people lose confidence in Western print
and TV media because of the propaganda content, Washington’s agendas, which
depend on lies, are experiencing rougher sledding.
Truth is bubbling up through Washington’s propaganda. Confronted
with the possibility of a loss of control over every explanation, Hillary
Clinton, Ed Royce, and the rest are suddenly complaining that Washington is
“losing the information war.” Huge sums of taxpayers’ hard
earned money will now be used to combat the truth with lies.
What to do? How to suppress truth with lies in
order to remain in control? The answer says
Andrew Lack, Royce, et alia, is to redefine a truth-teller as a
terrorist. Thus, the comparison of RT and “dissident” Internet bloggers
to the Islamist State and the designated terror group, Boko Haram.
Royce expanded the definition of terrorist to include
dissident bloggers, such as Chris Hedges, John Pilger, Glenn
Greenwald and the rest of us, who object to the false reality that
Washington creates in order to serve undeclared agendas. For
example, if Washington wants to pour profits into the military/security complex
in exchange for political campaign contributions, the politicians cannot say
that. Instead, they claim to protect America from a dangerous enemy or from
weapons of mass destruction by starting a war. If politicians want to advance
American financial or energy imperialism, they have to do so in the name of
“bringing freedom and democracy.” If the politicians want to prevent the rise
of other countries, such as Russia, President Obama has to depict Russia as a
threat comparable to the Ebola virus and the Islamist State.
Noam Chomsky summed it up when he said that Washington
regards any information that does not repeat Washington’s propaganda to be
intolerable.
Washington’s assault on truth as a threat helps to make
sense of the gigantic National Security Agency spy system exposed
by William Binney and Edward Snowden. One of the
purposes of the spy network is to identify all
“dissidents” who challenge Big Brother’s “Truth.”
There is, or will be, a dossier on every “dissident” with
all of the dissident’s emails, Internet searches, websites visited, phone
calls, purchases, travels. The vast amount of information on each dissident can
be combed for whatever can be taken out of context to make a case against him,
if a case is even needed. Washington has already successfully
asserted its power over the Constitution to indefinitely detain without charges
and to torture and to murder US citizens.
It was a couple of years ago that Janet Napolitano, head of Homeland Security, said that the department’s focus had shifted from terrorists to domestic extremists. Lumped into the category of domestic extremists are environmental activists, animal rights activists, anti-war activists which includes disillusioned war veterans, and people who believe in states’ rights, limited government and accountable government. Consequently, many dissidents, America’s best citizens, will qualify as domestic extremists on several accounts. Chris Hedges, for example, is an advocate for animals (see www.opednews.com/articles/Choosing-Life-by-Chris-Hedges-Animals_Cattle_Corporate_Dairy-150420-878.html ) as well as concerned about the environment and Washington’s never-ending wars.
The spying and the coming crackdown on “dissidents”
might also explain the $385 million federal contract awarded to a
subsidiary of Dick Cheney’s firm, Halliburton, to build detention camps in the
US. Few seem to be concerned with who the
camps are to detain. There is no media or congressional
investigation. It seems unlikely that the camps are for hurricane or forest
fire evacuees. Concentration camps are usually for people
regarded as unreliable. And as Lack, Royce, et alia have made clear,
unreliable people are those who do not support Washington’s lies.
A perceived need by Washington, and the private power
structure that Washington serves, to protect themselves from truth could also
be the reason for the very strange
military exercises in various of the states to infiltrate, occupy, and round-up
“threats” among the civilian population. (see h
) Even the presstitute CNN
reported that the National Guard troops sent to Ferguson, Missouri, were
programmed to view the civilian protesters as “enemy forces” and “adversaries,”
and we know that the state and local militarized police are
trained to view US citizens as threats.
As far as I can discern, not many Americans, whether
Democrat or Republican, liberal, conservative, or super-patriot, educated or
not, understand that Washington with the cooperation of its presstitute media has
defined truth as a threat. In Washington’s opinion, truth is a
greater threat than Ebola, Russia, China, terrorism, and the Islamic State
combined.
A government that cannot survive truth and must resort to
stamping out truth is not a government that any country wants. But such an
undesirable government is the government that
Clinton-Bush-Cheney-Obama-Hillary-Lack-Royce have given us.
Does it satisfy you? Are you content that in your name
and with taxes on your hard-earned and increasingly scarce earnings, Washington
in the 21st century has murdered, maimed, and displaced millions of peoples in
eight countries, has set America on the path to war with Russia and China, and
has declared truth to be an enemy of the state?